Commentary and analysis on matters related to beta including indexing, exchange traded funds (”ETFs”), derivatives, their application in the portfolio management process and their effect on the investment industry.

Commodities and Dubai

Just got back from yet another conference and no surprise it covered the current hot topic: commodities.

Speaking of hot, this event was in Dubai. I’ve experienced some hot and humid conditions in my life in places like Manila, Seoul, Singapore and Hong Kong. But this was by far the hottest climate I’ve ever experienced. It was a dry, baking heat. When outdoors, finding shade helped and certainly the buildings had great air conditioning. But, for example, I had my cousin who lives in the city take me around the gold (souk) market. Getting out of the car into the sun was incredible. It felt just like a dry sauna. And they say it’s just the beginning of the hot season! Luckily, the hotels, office buildings and shopping centres are all so luxurious that climate does not have to be a concern. With most taxis I rode in being a Lexus, you get a sense of what this city is about. Never mind the Burj Al Arab hotel, indoor skiing and other obvious signs of excess.

A quick comment on the souk. It’s all about gold there. Prices are quoted daily and there are people buying. I wish I was in Dubai six months ago and a year ago to get a handle on the number of people transacting. A good sign was at the retail section of the Dubai airport (departure section). They had a gold merchant right at the centre when you pass through the last security checkpoint (I think my carry on luggage was scanned only twice which is hopefully enough). Unlike the real souk market which was not empty but certainly not busy, this place was packed! And people were really buying. They didn’t look like momentum traders nor supermodels but everyday travelers. Maybe they know that gold is back to where it was near the beginning of the year:

Or more likely, maybe they new better than me than to take the heat and walk the outdoor souk.

From the moment you cruise into Dubai International or drive into downtown, you can’t help but notice the construction. It beats Las Vegas, Miami and other real estate bubble regions of the US. It kind of reminds me of Seoul when I first went there as a youngster in 1979. My bet is that Dubai will want to host an Olympics … but they’re held in August and if that’s still the hot season I just don’t know who could survive the marathons, triathlons and other outdoor events. Still, you can’t help but sense the feeling of ambition in Dubai. For some reason, a lot of the new buildings going up have the number of floors in the triple digits. Excess is a relative term when you’re in Dubai. The sense on the ground is that the construction boom is in full throttle but not anywhere close to the bubbly stage. But I can’t get my mind off the fact that a lot of the construction is done at night when the temperatures are simply cooler. It’s the endurance of the migrant workers who have the day shift that I find quite astonishing. Think of the pyramids in Egypt and the Yucatan, the Taj Mahal and other larger-than-life structures and the same can be said for the city of Dubai. The super-skyscraper “Burj Dubai” was front and centre from my hotel room window. I can’t remember and certainly could not even count the number of cranes working throughout the day and night when viewing the skyline. Part of the view is filled with very unique and certainly luxurious looking buildings, but among them were cranes working on competing structures. The success story that is the UAE is of course based on the decision of its leaders to diversify beyond oil. But the structures we see being built today, like the pyramids of the past are built from the labors of a massive force that are too often left forgotten. I think that in today’s world when we think about gold and oil, the supply/demand imbalances are often cited as being driven based on what’s happening in the emerging world. That’s certainly true, but the commodity that is labor is certainly a key factor as well and you can see that when driving by any construction site in Dubai. Of course, think of the factories in coastal China and the low cost IT worker in Bangalore and you quickly get the story of the emerging markets.

An important point to make on this is the importance of the success of the emerging markets in aggregate. It simply has to happen. Jeremy Siegel at Wharton wrote a paper in the September 2007 Financial Analysts Journal titled “Impact of an Aging Population on the Global Economy”. To summarize one of its key conclusions I begin with a simple fact: The western world is aging and it can’t eat its financial assets during its retirement stage. Much has been said of an equity market depression should the boomers sell their equity investments as a whole even if it’s spread out over several decades. Siegel’s paper articulates the fact that the growing middle class of the emerging world can be a very significant group that buys these financial assets. As individuals, they may not have much residual assets left for savings and investment, but in aggregate the numbers can and likely will be in their favor. This logic makes sense and our only hope is that the typical worker from the emerging markets does not go berserk with their discretionary spending and adopt a savings rate similar to many in the west. Furthermore, we have to hope that the western world does not adopt a protectionist stand. We see the beginning of potential trouble already. How do most Americans (never mind their government) feel about some sovereign wealth funds buying significant parts of major Wall Street financial conglomerates? What about if the same happens to media firms, utility companies and certain defence/high tech firms? Much of Western Europe isn’t happy with the rising growth of mosques versus churches across the continent. Will religious as well as racial discrimination hamper the transfer of wealth, and as important, capital investment? I think that the factors driven by demographics are so strong that any reasonable person or society will figure out what measures are required in order to survive. Unfortunately, the short-term horizon of politicians often conflict with this simple assumption.

Getting back to this commodities conference, the overall turnout was a bit of a disappointment but what was especially poor was the level of institutional investors in attendance. I couldn’t find one. Luckily I had meetings set up for me prior to traveling or this would have been a rather uneventful trip. One observation that I made was the fact that despite this being a commodities event in a growing part of the emerging markets, on day one of this conference all sessions except for one made some reference to indexing, passive investing or the use of ETFs. I did not attend day two and so I can only wonder if this fact remained true. Now I know that most of the discussion revolved around the active use of ETFs and/or derivatives but this still strengthens my case that the ETF story is not only strong but expanding globally. I think that the saturation we see today in the US will grow to many other regions. However, it’s still early. Today, there are no ETFs domiciled in Dubai. Great fanfare has been made about Dubai as the financial centre bridging the time gaps between the financial centres of Europe and East Asia. It will only be a matter of time before Dubai becomes a hub for derivatives and ETFs. From my travels, I see a parallel between ETFs (or financial services products in general) and airports. The US and Europe are full of busy yet aging airports. The emerging world is now making waves about their fancy new and relative large airports, albeit in much smaller numbers. I think the ETF industry will expand to these same regions with a few but relatively large (by asset levels) offerings in the not too distant future. Who knows what the expansion will be like thereafter. I don’t see a duplication of what has happened in the US but perhaps something fairly close in a few markets. We’ll see how the BGI’s, SSGA’s and other ETF providers do in entering these markets to compete with the local providers.

By the way, I’ve mentioned that the ETF industry within the region is still sparse. However, we’re not much better here in North America. The SPDR S&P Emerging Middle East & Africa ETF (GAF) is all we have now.

Not exactly the greatest diversifier but the high correlation story is one you’ve heard from me enough times I’m sure.

An interesting tone I sensed at this conference and confirmed at my meetings was some urgency in terms of dealing with the commodity complex. The need for active management was clear. Most would agree that a “buy-hold” mentality just doesn’t make sense for this highly volatile asset class. This would be true not just for a diversified (index-like) exposure but also positions in specific sub-indices (agriculture, metals, energy) or direct single commodity exposures. Despite the fact that so many commodity tracker funds have been launched in recent months and years, it looks like the need for them is very high indeed.

If you were to ask an investor what was their main reason for commodities exposure, you’d get a variety of answers. This may be true for any stock, hedge fund or asset class but I’m very interested in those given for commodities: inflation hedge, low correlation to other major asset classes, macroeconomic rationale given growth of emerging markets and relative dormancy in 1980’s and 90’s, demise of US dollar. These are all risk based rationale but for whatever reason, it seems like there’s a vast array of investors jumping on the Jim Rogers bandwagon. This includes the many ETFs, ETCs and ETNs that have hit the market over the past few years with exponential growth both in terms of numbers and assets. Should there be cause for concern that these new assets are helping fuel the fire? I think so as it will likely lead to greater volatility both up and down. Don’t get me wrong, even without all these new commodity tracker funds, I’m still in the camp that we’re in a long secular bull market albeit with the strong possibility of down markets (drops of 20% easily) with the possibly of not regaining new highs until at least six to twelve months if not longer. The question is whether the magnitude of drops and time to recovery are magnified due to ETFs and related instruments. I can’t help but think so.

And the main reason why I think this is so is just from considering who would be using these commodity trackers. The big user has to be the hedge funds which for me includes managed futures/CTAs. Don’t have anything against them. My first job in the industry was basically in this space although the focus was squarely on equity indices. Just like quant funds that were quite synchronous (unfortunately to the down side) in the late summer of 2007, I could see CTAs herding in and out of the broad commodities complex to capture the major up and down markets … I’m not saying they’ll all move in line to day-to-day volatility.

This excess momentum due to mass herding is what angers the emerging countries when they consider the foreign “speculators” (not “investors”) getting in and out of their market. That’s one of the prices of capitalism. The key, like we see in Dubai, is to find the long-term story. Dubai and other countries in the GCC region and beyond will not only survive but evolve into a longer term success story based on their ability to reap the rewards of this high oil price period (or “era” depending on how long this lasts). My hope is, just as South Korea copied the Japanese model through a well educated workforce and strongly industrialized infrastructure, the neighboring countries in the gulf and the broader MENA region can duplicate some of the success of Dubai. We can see some of this already in Bahrain and Qatar but there needs to be more.

Final thought on Dubai. I had dinner with a gentleman in the industry and asked what model Dubai used for its success to diversify beyond its core asset. My guess was Hong Kong but he said it was Singapore. Makes sense since Singapore is a bit more diversified in terms of having had greater labor requirements in the past (not so much today) from abroad to help build its infrastructure whether it be engineering, financial or otherwise. Singapore definitely has a more culturally diverse population than Hong Kong or any other Asian city I can think of. In this regard, I can’t help but think that the commodity that is often left unconsidered or, at best, overlooked is labor. Where will the migrant worker move to next? Where can one find skilled or at least partially skilled labor? I heard of the incredible housing and food inflation in the UAE and I wonder how that effects the laborer at the very bottom of the ladder. Probably not well but it’s certainly better than their prospects at home. Still, on one of my comfortable taxi rides, I saw a bus packed full of workers … something I’ve seen in countless other cities but I could see that conditions for them were not good. Not to pick on Dubai, but I wonder how fair their labor laws are for immigrant workers. This question is easily applicable to other booming economies that have significant immigrant populations and the debate in the US on this subject is an appropriate example even though their economy, nor its outlook in my opinion, could not be described as booming. This trip was certainly an eye opener for me. The chance to see and feel the luxury was nice but I’m glad I was able to observe a bit of the other side although from far away. Cliche as it it may be, I think it’s Pierre Trudeau who first said something to the effect that you really don’t appreciate the value of Canada until you’ve traveled the world. It’s certainly not meant to be an insult to Dubai - clearly one of the great success stories of the emerging world and especially within a volatile region - but I find it interesting that after this trip I realized just how great Canada is. Maybe it’s also the fact that we get roughly ten days at most of 40 degrees Celsius heat or worse a year.

I spent some time today with my wife and daughters at the park with warm sun and a cool breeze. Perfect weather.

Is Commodity ETF Slicing and Dicing Necessary?

If there’s an area where commentary has exceeded that which is required, it has to be in the commodity complex. For every Jim Rogers on the bullish side there is more than likely an equally vocal counterpart on the other side. True to expectations, with such a hot sector, we have seen a decent share of commodity related ETFs, with certainly more than enough in the energy subsector. Broad based commodity index ETFs [PowerShares DB Commodity Index TrackingFund (DBC) and iShares GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust (GSG)] have allowed for a one-stop shotgun approach but now Deutsche Bank (DB) and PowerShares have sliced and diced yet another sector (follow the Deutsche Bank link) but, to me, this development does deserve merit.

What investors now have is the ability to fine tune their required commodity allocation instead of letting DBC and GSG do it. The new funds are:

  • PowerShares DB Agriculture Fund (DBA)
  • PowerShares DB Base Metals Fund (DBB)
  • PowerShares DB Energy Fund (DBE)
  • PowerShares DB Oil Fund (DBO)
  • PowerShares DB Precious Metals Fund (DBP)
  • PowerShares DB Silver Fund (DBS)
  • PowerShares DB Gold Fund (DGL)
  • Is this slicing and dicing really required?

    According to the factsheet for DBC on the DB Funds website, this is its breakdown:

  • 35% light sweet crude
  • 20% heating oil
  • 12.5% aluminum
  • 11.25% corn
  • 11.25% wheat
  • 10% gold
  • According to the iShares website, GSG, which tracks the GSCI Total Return Index, has a breakdown of:

  • 71% energy
  • 11% industrial metals
  • 11% agriculture
  • 5% livestock
  • 2% precious metals
  • The DBC factsheet also gives some information that should be of no surprise to the commodity index investor. The performance table shows 1 year returns as of September 30, 2006 of 9.32% for the DB Commodity Index, -21.14% for the GSCI and -6.11% for the DJ-AIG Commodity Index. This type of wide discrepancy is commonly found when comparing various hedge fund indices but not your more traditional indices. The problem is in the composition. I would strongly suggest that investors in this space read this feature article from IndexUniverse.com written by Matt Hougan titled “Choose Your Commodity Index Wisely”. (The site requires membership which is free.) You’ll note that Matt’s article was written in May 2005 and the index breakdowns differ slightly from the data above but they’re not far off. Take special notice to the table at the end of his article that gives a nice comparison of the various indices and their breakdowns. Unfortunately, the DB Commodity Index was not one of the indices included in his analysis.

    There’s not a lot of trading history, so here’s the six month chart showing DBC and GSG:

    DBC GSG

    The general trends are similar but the gap is significant starting in early September when the lines diverge.

    Bottom line is that there’s little surprise that the GSCI had by far the worst performance of the three cited commodity indices due to its roughly three-quarters exposure to energy.

    Although I’m not as big an oil bull as I was one year or two years ago, longer term I’m still a bull. Recent news has suggested that the environment is as high a priority as any other to the average citizen. How will this play out in the energy/alternative energy space is a whole other blog entry. Whatever my call (or your call is), for sizeable portfolios and for sophisticated investors, DBC or GSG just can’t provide the precision required for adequate portfolio management. The commodity complex is just too broad a space to be managed with just a DBC or GSG position … aside for the very small sized portfolio.

    Clearly, the new PowerShares ETFs overlap considerably with existing ETFs. Still, we’re seeing what I believe to be the first exposure into the agricultural space. The base metals ETF allows for exposure to aluminum, zinc and copper which have gained considerable online chatter over the past few years. The energy ETF is similar to USO and provides for a more diversified instrument compared to its counterpart, DBO.

    To those that argue that the ETF market has, and continues to, “slice and dice” … I say their argument is strong for certain areas like the US equity market. In the case of the commodity complex, what Deutsche Bank and Powershares have brought to market is ideal.

    Gold Miners ETF: Learning from the Canadian Model (GDX)

    A quick note for investors looking to get into gold stocks, since they’ve dropped about as much as anything else out there. With a lot of discussion regarding Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX), we in Canada have had a similar instrument in the Canadian Gold Sector Index Fund (XGD). It is also an ETF consisting of gold producers, but these are for those within the S&P/TSX gold subindex. For those considering GDX who wish to throw some longer term historical numbers into their spreadsheets to run some backtests, note that you can go to Yahoo Finance and punch in XGD.TO to get numbers back to March 2001. This may make better sense than using gold bullion prices for asset allocation historical simulations.

    More info on this Canadian domiciled ETF can be found here.

    Note that XGD only has 17 holdings and so with an MER of 0.55% it isn’t a great bargain within the ETF space. According to the Van Eck Global website, GDX has approximately 45 gold mining companies and is very similar in terms of cost.

    iShares™ CDN Gold Sector Index Fund

    Again, my point here is that XGD is your only tradable instrument for which you can obtain a roughly 5-year history to see how it would have affected your portfolio.

    Also take note that XGD has a high correlation to GLD but is significantly more volatile. Point of fact: Peak price of XGD was on May 11th at 92.00. Opening price on Tuesday was 62.50. 32.1% drop but it brings us roughly back to where we were only 3 months ago as shown below!

    I like the combination of a gold stock ETF, like GDX or XGD, along with a gold bullion ETF such as GLD or IAU. However, due to the relatively high volatility, for me this “gold combo” gets a smaller allocation of roughly 5-10% combined of the total portfolio. For a more tactical or global macro mandated fund, I’d still control maximum allocation to probably no more than a third based on a simple risk budget metric.

    A Shopping List for This Selloff (EEM, VWO, TLT)

    Whether you believe that the correction is nearly over, or that we’re about halfway through (or even more bearish than that), hopefully you have built some cash reserves and hopefully this was done prior to the May selloff. If so, it’s time to build a shopping list. Here are some positions to consider:1) First, a look at an area that has been hurt badly and is probably the best area for constructive debate: emerging markets. The iShares emerging market ETF (EEM) has gone from a high of about 111.25 to 89.80 (always using yesterday’s close), down about 19.1%. Vanguard Emerging Markets VIPERs (VWO) has gone from a high of about 76.51 to 61.63, down about 19.4%.

    Coincidentally, according to the charts, we’re right back where we were at the beginning of 2006. Roughly 0% return YTD. Now, there’s been a lot of talk about potential slowing of trade in the EM region as a consequence to bearish views on the US economy and rightly so, but what percentage of future EM trade will be dependent on North America? Separately, looking at a long-term chart of EEM/VWO, you have to think that some steam had to be released from the pressure cooker.

    Also important to note are the big holdings in EEM/VWO like Samsung Electronics. It is the largest holding in both of these ETFs with roughly 5% weighting in each. That’s actually not bad compared to Samsung’s roughly 20% weight in the South Korean ETF (EWY). South Korea is down just over 16% since its peak in early May and so it isn’t surprising that EEM/VWO are both down similar amounts considering that there are some large holdings from this one country (Of note, South Korea raised rates unexpectedly today which could further the bleeding … in fact South Korea was down 3.5% Thursday with the rest of east Asia performing similarly).

    Of course, there are significant holdings in other EM regions like Latin America which have been even worse. The Latin America ETF (ILF) is down about 22.6% since its peak on May 10th. Again coincidentally, ILF is very close to where it was at the beginning of the year. The numbers may sound scary, but I think there’s plenty of room for prices to go down further. How far and for how long no one can know. I haven’t even commented on views regarding the BRIC countries and news of possible upcoming BRIC ETFs. But as a long-term investor, I think it would be prudent to at least have a 5-10% allocation to EM equities such as EEM or VWO. The trick will be avoiding major drawdowns like we’ve seen in the past month.

    2. Bond ETFs. Inflation and the debate if there is or isn’t any, or if there will be or won’t be any in the near future has almost made my mind numb on the subject. It seems like it’s an unending debate on CNBC but luckily the World Cup will occupy a lot of my upcoming screen time. We’re still not fully in on our bond exposures (relatively overweight cash in lieu of bond ETFs). We’ve held certain index bond mutual funds and a few bond ETFs (including TIP) but are currently working on this area of the shopping list. I’d like to see a US domiciled international bond ETF. Let me know if there is one. For now, I’m watching TLT. I’ll update our progress on this area in a later entry.

    3. Commodities. We’ve held all our commodity based ETFs during this market downturn as we have only about a 5% weight in materials (gold related ETFs) and energy (IGE, PBW). Of note to Canadian investors, we hold the TSX gold subindex ETF [XGD] and the TSX energy subindex ETF [XEG], both traded on the TSX.

    We may rebalance these by topping up at some point but expect both gold and oil related ETFs do drive up sharply over the summer months. For those that have been tactically inclined and gotten out of these positions recently, I can only bet that you are contemplating new points of entry. But, like the EM positions from point #1, these are obviously volatile so from a risk budgeting framework, I would not consider putting more than 10-15% in the commodity complex.

    We, up here in Canada, are not immune to the “home bias” phenomenon so have greater than global market cap weighted allocation to Canadian equities. Thus, since a broad Canadian ETF has nearly 50% allocation to materials/energy, an investor with a 10-15% allocation to the commodity complex plus a 20% allocation to Canadian equities may actually have close to a 25% commodity sensitive portfolio.

    Thursday’s opening bell is about to go off. Despite some news from Iraq, the mood is not good at all after market action from Europe and Asia. A lot of uncertainty. Wouldn’t be surprised if VIX finally breaks above 20.